|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WHAT IS THIS? The CMU Daily – to which you are subscribed. Unsubscribe information is at the end. NOTE: Make sure you 'enable images' to see this e-bulletin properly. CLICK HERE to read this online. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
back to top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
back to top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT PROMISES CLARIFICATION ON CONTROVERSIAL DEB CLAUSE Critics have said the proposal, Clause 17 of the bill, was undemocratic, and would allow ministers under the influence of the content industry lobby to introduce more draconian copyright protection programmes, without said programmes coming under proper scrutiny. Both the Lib Dems and the Conservatives have criticised the clause as the Bill is reviewed in the House Of Lords, the former, ironically, anti the provision partly out of a fear as to how the latter might use it should they form government later this year. Some allege that a Tory minister might use the Clause 17 powers to help the Rupert Murdoch empire reagards their recent allegations that Google and their like are unfairly benefiting from traditional media firms' copyrights. The government says it remains committed to the principal of Clause 17 - the idea is that things change in the internet world so quickly there needs to be a way to fast track new copyright rules to combat new forms of piracy faster - but has conceded that opposition to it is strong and says they will therefore table an amendment to better clarify the breadth and scope of the powers given to ministers by the clause. Opponents will now review the amendment as the Bill continues to work its way through parliament. A cynic might wonder if the controversial Clause 17 was put in there in the first place to sidetrack Bill opponents who would otherwise be shouting louder about the introduction of a three-strikes anti-piracy programme that could result in persistent illegal file-sharers having their net connections suspended. Though we don't know any cynics here at CMU. Seemingly aware that the "new rules on whim" clause is increasingly likely to be cut from the Bill, record industry trade body the BPI has reportedly made a last minute proposal for a new clause to be added to the new legislation, possibly to enshrine in law now something the body would otherwise have lobbied for as something to be introduced down the line via Clause 17. According to IT website The Register, the BPI is proposing a new provision that would allow content owners to secure injunctions, presumably from some sort of special court, to force websites hosting (or, possibly linking to) infringing content to remove said content (or link) with immediate effect. The proposal has similarities with the new copyright protection system currently being proposed in Spain (and reported on yesterday). Presumably the injunctions would work like a much tougher version of the cease and desist letters record companies dish out to websites they believe are infringing their copyrights. Ignoring an injunction, though, would presumably result in criminal as well as civil sanctions, which might make people more likely to act. More on these new last minute proposals when we get em. -------------------------------------------------- WARNER SIGN UP TO EMUSIC As previously reported, Sony Music started making some of its archive catalogue available to eMusic members last year. Prior to that the digital service only carried music from independent record companies. This was partly because eMusic has provided users with digital rights management free MP3s from the word go, and for years the majors refused to sell their music in such a format. Since the whole record industry opted for DRM-free downloading in 2008 the majors have presumably being weighing up eMusic's price point. Because the service basically sells MP3s in bulk, by charging a monthly subscription that enables a set number of downloads, their price point is lower than that of a la carte download services like iTunes. Of course eMusic has always positioned itself as the real music lover's download service, so arguably most of its users are more interested in less mainstream music. Though, of course, all the majors have lots of less mainstream music in their catalogues, so the addition of selected Sony and Warner tracks certainly adds value to eMusic's wider consumer proposition. Music from Warner labels Atlantic, Rhino and Warner Bros, plus indie labels distributed by Warner and not currently signed up to eMusic, will start to appear on the US version of the download club as a result of the new deal. Confirming the arrangement, Warner Music's SVP Digital Strategy, Stephen Bryan, told reporters: "As a leader in the music industry's transition to a predominantly digital music business, we have worked hard to encourage and support innovative partners and creative business models that offer our artists unique ways to reach their fans. We are pleased to be making our music available to eMusic's passionate membership". eMusic chief Danny Stein added: "Our editors look forward to contextualizing WMG's catalogue with the unique eMusic sensibility our members have come to expect. We're excited to work with Warner Music Group's labels, and by focusing on their hidden gems as well as classic albums, help them increase sales across their entire catalogue". -------------------------------------------------- WELCOME TO HADOPI, NOW LET US INFRINGE YOUR FONT RIGHTS The Hadopi agency - or the Haute Autorité Pour La Diffusion Des Oeuvres Et La Protection Des Droits Sur Internet, if you prefer (I don't) - will administer the much previously reported and rather controversial new anti-piracy initiative in France which will result in net users who persistently infringe copyrights through file-sharing having their internet connections disconnected. Three-strikes, of course, has many opponents, and is generally opposed by key players in the net provision and telecommunication industries. Either way, in the web domain, Hadopi will be a big copyright enforcer. So imagine the joy of the more petty of those opponents when it was revealed that the Hadopi logo employed a manipulated version of the font Bienvenue, a font neither the government office nor their design agency had a license to use. Because, yes, there is copyright in typefaces, people. Font rights are probably among the most abused on a commercial level, but one would assume a government appointed copyright enforcer might remember to buy a licence for the fonts they use in their own corporate identity. The main reason the unlicensed font was spotted by the font geeks is that Bienvenue was created by designer Jean-Francois Porchez specifically for France Telecom, and therefore no other commercial operation can get a licence to use it. Oh dear, that means Team Hadopi are infringing a copyright owned by a telecommunications giant. Brilliant. A journalist from French news site Numerama has investigated the logo, and has told TorrentFreak that Porchez has confirmed that it uses his font, albeit with a little manipulation, especially of the 'd' and 'p', which have been stretched to form a box around the 'o'. But the manipulation isn't enough to constitute a new font, and, according to Numerama, the design agency who created the corporate identity have admitted as much and are now trying to find a similar looking font which they can licence. Team Hadopi have issued an apology for their cock up, which France Telecom has accepted, so no legal action is likely from that department. However, TorrentFreak say Porchez - who may or may not have rights himself in the font - is consulting his lawyers. So Hadopi's first major project may, as yet, be fighting rather than pursuing an infringement claim. THE INTENT OF OINK WAS LEARNING, NOT FRAUD, SAYS FOUNDER As also previously reported, the prosecution's case, presented in Teesside Crown Court last week, focused in particular on the donations mechanism that operated on the site, and the monies amassed through it - which prosecutors claim amounted to $300,000 by the time the site was shut down in 2007. The prosecution's argument is that generating cash was one of the motivating factors behind Ellis setting up and running the online community. The fact money changed hands isn't really relevant in assessing Ellis' liability for copyright infringement. Ellis insists that - unlike the Oink users who were successfully pursued for copyright crimes - he isn't personally guilty of infringement, because he didn't personally host or share any infringing content. But there would seem to be a very strong case for doing Ellis for so called 'authorising infringement' in line with the cases pursued against Napster and Grokster in the US, Kazaa in Australia, and in Sweden against The Pirate Bay. However, with the charges here being conspiracy to defraud, the authorising infringement seems to be a side issue, even though it's much easier to prove. For the fraud charges to stick the just needs to be convinced that Ellis intended to profit - at the music industry's detriment - by providing the tools that helped others to illegal share music. Which is presumably why Ellis was yesterday keen to position the whole Oink venture as a geeky programming project that got out of control. He told the court how he created the website while studying at Teesside University, and in the months after he finished his degree, mainly because he felt the programming skills he'd been taught were outdated and that he should endeavour to teach himself some up to date web-based programming. He explained how the Oink service was originally hosted on a computer in his bedroom but how, as traffic started to build, he moved it to a commercial service in Amsterdam. Such hosting costs money, of course, which is possibly where the donations system came into the mix. Asked to clarify his intentions at the outset of the Oink project, the Press Association report that Ellis said: "I didn't have an intention, I was furthering my skills as a programmer, as a software engineer". The case continues. -------------------------------------------------- SHAKIN STEVENS FOUND GUILTY OF ASSAULTING The incident occurred in December 2008 at the Tullyglass Hotel in Ballymena, where the singer was performing. Hugo McNeice was photographing the show and told the court that at one point Stevens had danced over to him in order to, he thought, give him "a nice tight shot", but instead the singer hit the camera with his microphone stand, breaking it. Shaky was fined £300 for the assault and ordered to pay compensation of £479 to McNeice for damage to his camera. The singer maintains that he is innocent and has said that he will appeal the ruling. MIGHT SYSTEM OF A DOWN RETURN THIS YEAR? Bassist Shavo Odadjia tweeted "Are u guys ready for System???" However, that was followed up yesterday by the less vague and decidedly non-committal "About my 'are u guys ready for System?' I'm not sayin we are back but, if so? U guys ready? SoRry for gettin u guys amped. I'm just seeing". Still, looks like Odadjia might be lobbying his bandmates for a return. -------------------------------------------------- SLASH SAYS NO LED ZEP REUNION GOOD The guitarist says he backs Robert Plant's decision not to turn Led Zeppelin's one off reunion gig in 2007 into a full blow comeback tour. He tells GQ: "When Robert Plant said he didn't want to tour after the comeback show, I thought that was the right thing. It was a special night, so why ruin it?" I think that too, but GQ are yet to ask me for my opinion. -------------------------------------------------- LOVE REVEALS NEW HOLE LINE UP Love announced last year that her long planned comeback album would be released and toured under the Hole name, though without any of the other members of her former band. This led to fellow Holer Eric Erlandson announcing that there is a contract between him and Love barring her from using the band's name without his involvement. Courtney denied that was so. As far as I'm aware that little dispute is unresolved. But nevertheless, Love last week announced that she, guitarist Micko Larkin, bassist Shawn Saily and drummer Stu Fischer would be performing under a banner saying Hole on a mini-European tour next month. So, that'll be fun. The new album will follow later this year. LET'S WRESTLE SIGN TO MERGE TING TINGS NAME NEW ALBUM Sadly, there isn't. Speaking to the NME, the duo's Jules De Martino explained: "Just round the corner to our studio there's a massage parlour, it's called Massage Kunst. It's Massage Art, basically. We took a picture of that and sent it to our label, saying this is the title of the album. They went berserk". He added that the new songs started out sounding like they might be good live, but they quickly put a stop to that, saying: "We listened back to some of the demos and we thought, 'Hold on a minute, this is sounding too much like we're rocking out live'. We bought a couple of old weird synths in New York and smuggled them in our suitcases back to Berlin and they started to come strong on the music". UNRELEASED HENDRIX SET FOR RELEASE Due out on 8 Mar, 'Valleys Of Neptune' will feature various tracks recorded between 1968 and 1970, including alternative versions of 'Fire' and 'Red House', the original versions of which appeared on The Jimi Hendrix Experience's debut album, 'Are You Experienced?'. There are also covers of Cream's 'Sunshine Of Your Love' and Elmore James's 'Bleeding Heart'. The title track will be released as a single on 1 Feb. Of the release, Hendrix's stepsister Janie, who produced the album and manages his estate, says: "My brother Jimi was at home in the studio. 'Valleys Of Neptune' offers deep insight into his mastery of the recording process and demonstrates the fact that he was as unparalleled a recording innovator as he was a guitarist. His brilliance shines through on every one of these precious tracks". Tracklist: Stone Free FACTORY OFFICES TURNED INTO CLUB More info from www.factorymanchester.com ALBUM REVIEW: Various Artists - Fabric Presents Elevator Music: Volume 1 (Fabric Records) From the calypso tinges of XXXY, to bashment with Doc Daneeka, it starts well. The highlights are Hackman's 'Pistol In Your Pocket', a real winner with its house-based Italo piano and solid beats, All in all, not amazing, but it's solid enough to keep you involved, and it will be interesting to see what 2010 holds for the artists featured in this project and this so-called new genre. PV Physical release: 18 Jan Buy from iTunes EUROSONIC AUDIENCE TO LEARN MUSIC MARKETING FROM A FOOTBALL EXPERT One of the more unusual speakers lined up for the conference bit of the programme is Peter Kentie, Marketing Manager with Dutch football club PSV Eindhoven. So, you might ask, what exactly will he be talking about in front of an audience of music industry chaps? Well, Kentie assures us that "the football and music industries relate more you think". Pre-empting his Friday session on "What we can learn from football", Kentie told CMU: "I think the music industry can learn a lot from the way football clubs promote their brands and intensify the fan relationship by using innovative technology and social media platforms". EMI MEET CITIGROUP'S MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TARGETS I think the performance targets were set by the US bank when it lent Terra Firma $4 billion to buy EMI, and are presumably designed to assure Citigroup that their rather large investment is safe in the struggling music firm. EMI's publishing division normally fulfils said criteria with ease, but the problematic recordings division always struggles, and sometimes needs to ask Terra Firma for some dosh to prop it up. I'm not sure what happens if EMI fails to meet the targets, though some gossipers say some Citigroup execs would love nothing more than to foreclose on its loan to the music company, most of which it reckons it could recoup if the major's catalogues were sold off tomorrow. Anyway, according to the Mail, this time round said targets were met with little stress, though a lot of that was the result of the big Beatles reissues programme last Autumn, which is arguably a one-off revenue boost for the record company. The Mail reports: "While the music publishing arm is understood to have passed the test with ease, the recorded music arm is thought to have struggled, but succeeded on the back of strong sales of The Beatles' digitally remastered albums, as well as contemporary artists, including Lily Allen and Katy Perry". As previously reported, Terra Firma are suing Citigroup claiming that the bank failed to provide key information when advising the private equity outfit on its EMI acquisition in 2007. The lawsuit followed Citigroup's reported refusal to renegotiate its loan agreement - Terra Firma reportedly proposed the bank take a one billion hit to help turn round the music major's fortunes. WARNER RECOUPED $9 MILLION FROM APPLE'S LALA.COM PURCHASE There was much speculation as to how much Apple paid for Lala.com, with estimates ranging from $17 million to $80 million. I'm not sure whether knowing Warner got $9 million of Apple's money gives us any extra clues regards the Lala price tag. Though, as previously reported, it was claimed the company was sitting on $14 million of cash reserves, which means that Apple might have got the digital music service for a real bargain basement price. Either way, I think it's fair to say Warner's recent digital adventures haven't gone so well. Their other big digital investment was in the now defunct Imeem. I don't know what the major can expect to see as a result of MySpace's purchase of most of Imeem's operations, though I doubt it'll be much more than some now unrequired servers and maybe quite a bit of unused stationery. -------------------------------------------------- PANDORA GOES INTO PROFIT One of the original interactive streaming music services, Pandora make money from subscriptions, advertising carried on its free services, and sell-through to downloads of songs. It's thought the previously reported arrival of the service on mobile, and the resulting boost in users and subscribers, has helped the firm go into profit ahead of schedule. Given all the chatter about the long term sustainability of the various streaming music services that have launched in the last year or so, this news is possibly heartening. Though pessimists might point out that Pandora's success has been largely down to its rejection of the truly on-demand music model, which means it pays much cheaper licence fees to the music companies. Conservative growth - including a withdrawal from markets where favourable royalty deals were not forthcoming, such as the UK - may have also played a part. UK X-FACTOR MAY MOVE TO ACCOMMODATE US VERSION US network Fox seem keen to schedule their version of the Cowell franchise in the Autumn months but that, of course, is when ITV airs the UK version. And once the series goes into live sing-off stage, that could lead to some scheduling clashes. Even if Cowell and Cole were to both commit to a carbon-rich Atlantic-hopping few weeks, if both networks wanted live weekend shows then clearly, unless there is a dramatic jump in the science of cloning in the next year, that's not going to work. Which has led to speculation that ITV will have to move its 'X-Factor' to a different time of year, so that the live show bits of both it and 'Britain's Got Talent' take place in the first half of the year. Which would, at least, end the Christmas Number One component of the pop talent show. -------------------------------------------------- CENTRAL RADIO BUYER REVEALED As previously reported, UTV announced late last year that they had failed to make the newish Preston radio station commercially viable and would shut it down on Christmas Eve and hand the licence back to media regulator OfCom. But then the station got a last minute reprieve following the news a serious buyer was in takeover talks. Niocom was set up to operate community radio station Cheshire FM, and then expanded to buy Southport-based Dune FM. Central Radio will be the firm's third station. Radio Today quote Niocom's MD David Duffy as follows: "We intend to continue our strategy of developing stations with a strong local identity, staffed by local talent, and meeting local needs. Central is a good fit geographically for our operation, and whilst the station is in a competitive market, we believe that if positioned correctly, it has great potential". JEDWARD TO WORK WITH VANILLA ICE Says Walsh: "They are beyond excited about working with Vanilla Ice - I've never seen them so excited". The Sun, meanwhile, cite a source close to the one time rap star as saying: "Ice couldn't wait to work with the boys after seeing their performance. He thought it was genius and now sees the chance to bring his record to a much younger audience". Can someone please explain to Mr Van Winkle the meaning of the word 'genius'? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||